Discussion #3

1.) I generally read over an assignment for a paper two or three times before beginning. I re-read the directions over and over as I write the paper, to make sure I answer all of the questions, and give the reader every detail. I read over it a numerous amount of times while I am writing, and twice after my first draft is done. There are many benefits of looking over a paper after you are finished. Looking over a paper after you are done esures that what you want to say is what actually appears on paper. While you are writing you may think you answered the question, but actually missed out on a few important pointers. It will also help you to catch some of your grammar mistakes and spelling mistakes. The computer does not always catch your mistakes.

2.) I can apply the "Consider the Evidence" information to the drafting of an Argument from Personal Experience paper by experimenting with my own eyes and hands, instead of through sources like (magazines, or television.) Using your own facts relates you to your paper and helps you go more into details. Using sources does not always fully support your ideas.

3.) What is the most useful information from the "Academic Writing is an Analysis" section is do not write a summary unless directly asked to. I tend to gather all of the information and try to imply the whole thing to the writing assignment. I tend to skip out on the important details rather than cover the important details. The analysis part needs to be more explained in class, I don not understand.

4.) Some similarities for the two are mostly everything that a perfect paper would be. There are really no differences. They both are clear on how to create perfect papers.